Resource Management: The Blind Spot in Project Management

When we talk about project management, we instinctively think of deadlines, budgets, and deliverables. Yet one critical element often flies under the radar: resource management. It’s frustrating to see that even the most organized and realistic project managers—those who meticulously plan their timelines—are not rewarded if they overlook the workload aspect. The reliability of a project depends as much on resource availability as on schedule accuracy.

The Problem with Workload Planning

A task can only be completed if the required resources are available at the right time. But this availability is the result of a far more complex equation than what a typical schedule can capture. Resources are involved in other projects, or tied up in recurring operational activities that are often neither visible nor synchronized with project planning tools. Meanwhile, project managers plan according to deadlines, without always knowing the full scope of additional activities weighing on the resources they intend to use.

This lack of visibility is structural: the tools used on both sides—project management versus operations—are not the same and don’t communicate with each other. As a result, actual resource workload is ignored in planning, making schedules partially ineffective as soon as constraints arise.

And even if the initial plan did account for both sides, it would still need to be continuously updated—because projects evolve, operations have their own disruptions, and the reality on the ground changes fast. Without permanent synchronization, no workload plan can be considered reliable.

The Overlap of Activities

The main difficulty lies in the fact that resources are not limited to one type of activity. They work simultaneously on long-term planned projects and on day-to-day operational tasks. These latter tasks, while less visible, consume a significant share of available time and energy.

Operational activities are rarely planned with the same level of rigor as projects. They often depend on habits, emergencies, or workload peaks that escape any structured planning tool. This lack of visibility creates a decision-making fog for both project managers and resource leaders, who struggle to prioritize objectively.

That’s why the responsibility must be broadened: managing the workload cannot rest solely on the project manager’s shoulders. It requires close coordination with line managers, who are ultimately accountable for the real availability of their teams. It also means breaking down silos between tools and departments, to build an integrated view of all commitments—whatever their nature.

A Dynamic Approach to Effective Planning

To overcome these challenges, it’s crucial to adopt a more flexible and responsive approach. Resource management must be continuously aligned with planning, allowing teams to anticipate bottlenecks and adjust priorities in real time. This calls for a rethinking of how we manage availability, by systematically cross-referencing project needs with upcoming operational loads.

But that’s not enough. We must also implement capacity management, with regular feedback loops to adjust both forecasts and trade-offs. Though still uncommon, this dynamic approach is the only realistic way to reconcile short-term constraints with long-term project goals.

This paradigm shift not only optimizes resource usage—it also enhances overall project reliability.

Resource management : do you face this challenge too?

Good news—we have the solution.

Join our webinar, where we formalize practical and actionable solutions that few organizations truly master. If you genuinely want to eliminate this problem and see things differently, we're here to help you solve it—for good.