top of page

Key Challenges in Project Management and How to Overcome Them

  • Photo du rédacteur: Xavier HOVASSE
    Xavier HOVASSE
  • 6 févr.
  • 5 min de lecture
Equipe en train de parler

Most of the time, when I begin my interventions, I start by assessing the challenges faced by my counterparts. What I often find is that the problems raised rarely concern technical aspects or skills related to the core of their business. On the contrary, recurring difficulties often relate to cross-functional aspects that can be crucial to the success or failure of a project. It is on this basis that I am sharing my insights in this article.


1. An Unclear and Unstable Definition of Objectives


One of the first difficulties in project management is the lack of a clear and stable vision of objectives. Very often, the sense of urgency pushes teams to start a project quickly without taking the necessary time to properly define and frame it. As a result, objectives remain vague and unstable, leading to misinterpretations, wasted time, and scattered efforts.

This initial lack of clarity has consequences throughout the project's progress: tasks are regularly questioned, priorities constantly shift, and teams experience a climate of continuous reevaluation. Frequent, poorly prepared, and poorly communicated changes are often detrimental to team morale and lead to demotivation.


How to Overcome This Challenge?

  • Progress on two fronts: first clarification, then validation.

  • Clarification ensures that the project is well-defined and framed by identifying needs, objectives, and constraints while ensuring that all stakeholders share the same understanding.


Best Practice: One effective way to define a project is to explicitly state what it is not. By specifying exclusions and project boundaries ("We are not doing X, but we are doing Y"), misunderstandings and misinterpretations are avoided. It is often easier to exclude than to include, which provides valuable clarity from the outset.

  • Validation ensures the stability of decisions made. It is crucial to have stakeholders validate all initial project parameters to ensure they will not be challenged later and that they truly meet the intended needs.


Best Practice: One of the best ways to achieve effective validation is to be perfectly explicit about the deliverables to be produced. By making the project's execution tangible, misunderstandings are avoided, and all stakeholders remain aligned with expectations.


2. Suboptimal Resource Management


Another major obstacle to the successful execution of a project is resource availability. Resource management is often overlooked in planning. Too often, schedules are created without being correlated to workload plans, meaning that deadlines are managed without ensuring that the necessary resources will be available to complete the planned tasks.

This lack of synchronization causes delays that are difficult to anticipate since resource management was not considered from the outset. In reality, resource unavailability is rarely an unforeseen event; rather, it is a gap in planning. Insufficient anticipation can severely impact the smooth running of the project, as it is not only essential to know what resources are needed but also precisely when they must be available.


How to Overcome This Challenge?


To avoid these difficulties, it is crucial to develop an integrated planning approach that considers workload and deadlines, regularly updated. A global and adaptable approach is preferable to an overly detailed but fragmented and temporary plan. Additionally, when resources are shared across multiple projects, it is vital to clearly define priorities to negotiate their availability when needed.


Best Practice: Do not hesitate to factor in the use of generic resources by setting up workload provisions, even if a specific person has not yet been assigned to the task. This helps create a long-term estimate of needs, independent of the ability to assign work to a collaborator whose availability remains uncertain.


3. Overly Tight Deadlines


Tight deadlines are often a major source of stress, errors, and quality compromises. Working under constant urgency can lead to significant deviations and jeopardize the achievement of initial objectives. Unfortunately, rapid action is often prioritized over rigorous planning. As a result, teams do not know where their actual margins of maneuver lie, and everything seems urgent and important, making it impossible to prioritize tasks effectively. This lack of planning maintains uncertainty and causes teams to feel constantly overwhelmed, reacting to constraints rather than making proactive decisions.

In practice, planning is too often done in reverse order, assuming that the set deadline must be met at all costs. This results in schedules designed to meet deadlines rather than ensuring the project's actual feasibility.

A project schedule should not only indicate when a deadline is set but also verify its actual feasibility. Either the schedule is realistic and reassuring, or it is not, in which case deadlines must be renegotiated, or the plan must be revised until it becomes achievable.


Best Practice: To ensure a realistic schedule, it is essential not to confuse the desirable with the feasible. Deadlines should reflect realistic commitments, and planning should illustrate what is genuinely possible. By confronting these two perspectives, a feasible and reliable project timeline is achieved.


4. Lack of Visibility and Coordination


When projects are managed in silos, communication between teams becomes a major obstacle. Aligning stakeholders and ensuring a balanced distribution of tasks becomes difficult. Unfortunately, when everyone works in isolation, they lack visibility on what is happening elsewhere. This can lead to inefficiencies, requiring rework or additional actions, and prevents the early detection of potential risks that could threaten the project's success.


How to Overcome This Challenge?


Regardless of the tools used, it is important to favor collaborative platforms where information can be shared without becoming an unstructured mess where everyone dumps unorganized data. Too much information can be just as problematic as too little.


Best Practice: It is crucial to strike the right balance by sharing only relevant information, structuring it effectively, and ensuring regular verification. Good coordination extends beyond planning; it also involves clear role definition, resource availability, and rigorous tracking of pending tasks. Regular team reviews allow each member to share their vision and understand the interdependencies of assigned tasks.


5. Universal Challenges and Cross-Sector Solutions


These challenges are not specific to any single industry. Whether in technology, construction, healthcare, or services, project management obstacles are universal. A structured approach transforms these challenges into opportunities for success.


Conclusion: Towards Optimized Project Management


To ensure the efficiency and success of your projects, it is essential to focus on the following key areas:

  • Clarification and project framing: Define precise objectives, expectations, and constraints.

  • Rigorous planning: Implement tools and methodologies to effectively anticipate deadlines and required resources.

  • Continuous monitoring and adjustments: Regularly track project progress and adapt the strategy based on real conditions.

  • Seamless coordination and communication: Ensure clear and effective information sharing among all stakeholders.


We understand that every context is unique and that these principles must be tailored to your specific challenges. That’s why we offer customized support to help structure your organization, optimize your processes, and integrate the necessary tools for effective project management. Feel free to reach out to us to discuss further!


 
 
 
bottom of page